top of page

Historical sketch...

 

 

1.2. Roman beginnings

 

To begin with, the Romans are believed to have been the first to invade the harmless Celts living on the British Isle. Admittedly, it was Julius Caesar that came first to the British Isle in 55 BC; still, despite the fact that he conquered a considerable part of Great Britain, permanent settlement was never found. Another invasion took place in 43 AD and was led by ClaudiusThe Celts, overwhelmed by Roman power and discipline, quickly surrounded to the Roman hegemony (Lambert, 2013). As  Shipton (2006) shows, the Thames was of great significance and the Romans built a city named Londinium along this river (see Figure 1 for illustration). The location of this city allowed the development of business, so it is not surprising that  it became promptly a well-prospering port and many guilds appeared there (City History, 2014). 

Figure 1. Ivan Lapper, Reconstructed View Showing Origins of the Tower at the South East Corner of Roman London, 400 AD. Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/reconstructed-view-showing-origins-of-the-tower-at-the-so134908

 

Still, not everyone accepted the defeat of the Celts, as a rebellion led by Boudica, a queen from the Iceni tribe, occurred. And once again, the mighty and self-disciplined Romans won, although the number of Celtic soldiers was higher (Lambert, 2013). As Cody (2010) states, after the reconstruction, London became a midpoint of Roman power, trade, administration, commerce and finance. Next, in order to protect themselves from the Picts, Hadrian Wall was built (Lambert, 2013). As  Shipton (2006) claims, the stones of this thick structure may be seen even today. Nevertheless, as Ackroyd (2000) shows, after long years of magnificence, the year 410 came and a helping hand offered previously by the Romans was taken back. London went to rack and ruin and it is believed that  this city entered a new period called Dark Ages.

Recent posts:

“London, London, London town,You can toughen up or get thrown around.” ― Kano

 

 

 

 

“One thing about London is that when you step out into the night, it swallows you.” 
― Sebastian Faulks, Engleby

 

 

 

 

“This was London, in all its filth and glory. Nostalgic for the past, while yearning to cast off the chains of bygone ages and step forward into the bright utopia of the future. Proud of its achievements, yet despising its own flaws. A monster in both size and nature, that would consume the unwary and spit them out again, in forms unrecognizable and undreamt.

"London, the monster city” 
― Marie Brennan, With Fate Conspire

rOMANS
Saxons
Normans
Intro
1.3.1.
norman kings
Angevins

 

1.4. London in the Medieval Era

 

The Normans started a new period in London's history and along with William the Conqueror the city entered the Middle Ages. The Medieval Era introduced many new changes and developments not only in the city, but also in England. Still, London did not perish, but existed and prospered. Its hustle and bustle was omnipresent far from ongoing battles over the throne. Besides, this city was in the background of the wars that were taking place in England. Hence, it is crucial  to get to know all circumstances of the main events and the kings and the queen that were struggling to win their claims to the throne. Thus, the new era started by William kept on and turned into a bloodshed during reign of the Normans and later of the Angevins and the Plantagenets.

 

1.4.1. The Normans at the begging of Medieval era

 

As Johnson (2015) shows, after the death of Edward the Confessor, Harold Godwin was chosen to be the king by Witan, a council consisting of people from high class. However, William the Duke of Normandy (see Figure 5 below), was not pleased with this decision. He maintained that Edward had made a promise of giving him the reign over England, and hence because of this claim William invaded the British Isle. According to Ackroyd (2000, p. 52), it was believed that London “neither fears enemies nor dreads being taken by storm,” as it was well-defended; nevertheless, the gate was opened for Norman Duke by some residents as a result of a suspicious treaty.  The battle did not last long, as London capitulated and the city toed the line to William. As Olson (2008) shows, this new king killed Harold gained control over the country in Hastings, in 1066.

            The Norman king was fully aware that London is of great importance to his reign and began to improve the position of this city. He made an effort to make it the capital of the country. As Johnson (2013) shows, London was  answerable only to the King, which was decided during the rulership of William. The city was protected by him and all rights, although taken from Anglo-Saxons tradition, were given once again. Moreover, this law enforcement was symbolic, as London was subject to the law established and implemented by itself (Ackroyd, 2000). Besides, as Olson (2008) maintains, crowning in London in Windsor Castle dates back to the reign of William the Conqueror, as every monarch believed to have William's blood. What is more, during the reign of William, many fortified castles appeared such as Windsor Castle, and London became once again the main residence of kings (Olson, 2008).

Figure. 5 William, Duke of Normandy, later King William I of England, William the Conqueror. Source:  https://wjartuso.wordpress.com/tag/battle-of-hastings/

 

1.4.2. The Norman kings

 

There were many different monarchs that lived in Great Britain and London was in the background of their struggle to ascend the throne. Let us first focus on the times shortly after the Norman conquest. To begin with, according to Ackroyd (2000), after Norman king, another William, however, called William Rufus the Red established new taxes and charges in London. As Spaltro and Bridge (2005) maintain, Rufus is remembered as a brave, apt and skilled king, despite his problems with the Church. He was able to find a solution to the dispute with his brother over the ruling. He is best described as a king on horseback, for he liked travelling, hunting and also taking part in many battles (Spaltro & Bridge, 2005, p. 11). After his death Henry I went to the city, as he wanted to ascend the throne. Nevertheless, he was more interested in his wealth than in  governing the city of London (Ackroyd, 2000). According to Spaltro and Bridge (2005), Henry I was skilful in his negotiations with nobles and apart from that, he introduced a strong centralised structure of administration and justice in Britain.  Still, after falling into eternal slumber, the choice of successor was not explicit, for as Hoskins (2010) shows, the rightful successor, the son of  this king, died and it was not clear who was to ascend the throne. Next,  Matilda  was believed to be chosen the next monarch; nevertheless, because of her being a woman, not having enough fame and an argument between her father and her husband, her claims were not taken into account. And that is why the nephew of Henry I attempted to win the claim to the throne. As Ackroyd (2000) maintains, he returned to London and convinced residents to choose him the king. Hence, it is believed that Londoners chose the king for the whole country. According to Hoskins (2010), however, in spite of his courage and piousness, Stephen (see Figure 6) was incapable as far as politics were concerned. 

 

 

Figure 6. Stephen. King of England. Source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/383117/Hunt-for-bones-of-King-Stephen

 

Moreover, as  Hoskins (2000) claims, a war between Matilda and Stephen occurred, but it was her son that became a threat to Stephen. Matilda was defeated, but Henry, her offspring was strong enough to challenge Stephen. The battles between these two men lasted long, and the intervention of aristocrats was unavoidable. It was decided in 1153 that Stephen would be the king but his successor was going to be Henry. 

 

1.4.3. The Angevins

 

 

As Spaltro & Bridge (2005) state, Henry II that came from the House of Anjou became a powerful ruler not only of Britain but also of Scotland, Ireland and moreover Wales. The Angevins reign is ullustrated best by the map below (see Figure 7).

 

 

 

Figure 7. The Angevin Empire in the late twelfth century showing the lands  ruled by Henry II of England. Source:  https://www.pinterest.com/pin/453948837411458399/

 

During his reign, as Ackroyd (2000, p. 55) shows,  London's autonomy was limited and the charter stated that the city will get all “liberties and free customs which they had in the time of Henry my grandfather,” and yet it was the royal sheriffs that ruled the city. Still, seeking only power, authority and control, and being aggressive and imperious, these all actions of Henry II, contributed to the  destruction of his lifelong friendship with Thomas Becket, an Archbishop of Canterbury and weakened the relationship with his sons (Spaltro & Bridge, 2005).

            Next in the line was Richard the Lionheart (see Figure 8), who is regarded as a hero, for he was prodigy in military planning, talented in politics and showed bravery. Nevertheless, he could be arrogant and careless, as he wanted to be famous even after his death, and that is why he took part in many crusades. According to Barett (1997), he spent most of his life not in England but in the French land. Because of the fact that he was absent, the country was in shambles. Moreover, he emptied the royal treasure for new expeditions to the Holy Land, and in order to make more money he sold rights, land and official posts (Richard the Lionheart, 2011). 

 

 

 

Figure 8. Richard the Lionheart. Source:  http://english-combat.co.uk/lionheart.htm

 

As Ross (n.d.) points out, during the reign of Richard I, London was granted the law of self-governance and the first Mayor was chosen the next year. Subsequent rulers agreed to this implemented law. 

            Next, another king that succeeded the throne was called John Lackland. The residents of London were to agree to his succession if he accepted the right of London to self-govern, as was it with communitas, in other words, city-states (Ackroyd, 2000). Because of his conflict with the clergy and the Pope, failures to defend the lands that belonged to the barons during the war with France, the increase of taxes, and moreover owing to personal grudges against the king, the nobles rebelled (Barett, 1997). The barons made John sign a document called the Magna Carta, which restricted the power of the monarch. Yet, at that time, this document was not perceived as something important and groundbreaking for both sides, as John thought of it as a form of stalling the barons. However, as it can be seen nowadays, its content influenced greatly the further dynasties (Ibeji, 2011). As Barett (1997, p. 41) claims, the cruelties that were done by John contributed to the appearance of “the Legendary Nottingham outlaw” named Robin Hood (Figure 9), who took treasures and money from the rich and gave them to the needy.

 

 

Figure 9. “Robin Hood and his Merry Men in Sherwood Forest” by Edmund George Warren, 1858. Corbis / Christie's - Source: http://www.historytoday.com/sean-mcglynn/real-robin-hood#sthash. YePQr9jz.dpuf

 

Nevertheless, it is not known whether Robin Hood was only a legend or existed in reality. He could have been born in 12th or in the 14th century. All the same, his presence can be seen in various poems and prose, for his courage and rebellion against rapacious sheriff is well-known and admired. He might have been an outlaw from Sherwood Forest, but his actions were heroic and he is remembered as a good person that aided the poor (Johnson, 2015). A ballad about Robin Hood goes as follows:

 

Lythe and listin, gentilmen,
That be of frebore blode;
I shall you tel of a gode yeman,
His name was Robyn Hode

(A Gest of Robyn Hode)

 

 

1.4.4. The Plantagenets

 

How the Plantagenets ruled? There were many kings from this dynasty whose actions and rules had a great impact on Britain and London. To begin with, one of the rightful Plantagenets was called Henry III, who is known to have lost lands of the British Isle, especially Poitou during his war with France. This event led to the rebellion of the barons whose leader was Simon de Montfort. The king was abolished and the parliament was convened; still, in 1266, Henry once again received the right to be the king. Next, we have Edward I who muted the protest of the barons and conquered Wales (Barett, 1997). And thanks to him and his excursion, England's power was consolidated, and dominating the remaining area of Great Britain was not a problem. It is also thought that because of this event, and furthermore by making English the official language, which took place in 1362, a “genuine sense of nationality” was born (Roberts, 2013). After his rule, Edward II came to power, but for the reason of losing Gascony and being defeated by Robert Bruce, the parliament deposed him. After him, the monarchy of the subsequent king Edward III was dominated by the Hundred Years' War with France between 1337-1453 (Barett, 1997).

            According to Roberts (2013), it is admirable that this dynasty had the throne for over 300 years. There were many events that happened during the reign of the Plantagenets, be it the Black Death, the Hundred Years' War, as was mentioned above, the Peasants' Revolt and moreover, Joan of Arc and her burning.

 

 

Figure 10. King Henry V at the Battle of Agincourt : The King wears on this surcoat the Royal Arms of England,

quartered with the Fleur de Lys of France as a symbol of his claim to the throne of France. Source: 

http://www.britishbattles.com/100-years-war/agincourt.htm

 

On the other hand, the triumph of Henry V in his Battle of Agincourt (as illustrated in Figure 10 above) in 1415 was thought to be a high point of this house. As De Lisle and Jones (2005) show, this dynasty ceased to exist after the War of Roses. Nevertheless, the Plantagenets did not allow themselves to be forgotten, as even Shakespeare did not ignore such a fine dynasty and wrote plays about them, although he is perceived as a master writer  of the Tudors.

 

 

1.4.5. Life in the Middle Ages

 

The description of London could be found in the works of many writers. One of them stated that “London is happy in its clean air, in the Christian religion, in the strength of its fortifications, in its natural situation, in the honour of its citizens” (Lambert, n.d.). London was lively and full of energy and the twelfth century was also a period of wealth and prosperity. As it can be seen, the hustle and bustle of this city was omnipresent. Besides, as shown in Figure 11, people loved horse markets, dancing, archery and even wrestling and when there was snow, ice skating became  popular (Lambert, n.d.).  

            After the Norman conquest London's population grew in number and about 18, 000 people lived there, which may not be astonishing for us nowadays; however, in the Medieval times it was a big number. The 12th century was a period when citizens started to construct their dwellings outside the city (Lambert, n.d.). Besides, one century later, London's growth in wealth and size was even more noticeable. Its area was enlarged because of this boost of population (Museum of London, 2011). Nevertheless, London was also full of contrasts. On the one hand we had the poor whose life was not easy, as leather boots cost the equivalent of their salary, and besides there were not any charity companies to help. Hence, beggars were omnipresent. On the other hand, the rich wallowed in luxury, for many expensive and sophisticated goods were being imported such as jewels, silks, spices and fruits (Museum of London, 2011).

            Next, the residential premises were made of clay, timber and thatch. Because of a great number of residents, new types of buildings having storeys appeared. In contrast to the poor, the rich built stone houses along with gardens and courts (Museum of London, 2011). Ross (n.d.) points out that in the 13th century straw was banned according to law, for fires were common; nevertheless, people disobliged this requirement. Moreover, in London many new docks, new shops, churches and chapels sprang up (Ackroyd, 2000).

Figure 11. Medieval market. Source:  http://www.historiasiglo20.org/MEC-BC/2-6-5.htm

 

 

         Religion was of great significance in the life of Londoners, as almost every of them was a Christian. That is why, Christianity thrived and people also took part in pilgrimages. Worth mentioning is the fact that the patron saint of the city was Thomas Becket and it is not surprising that the place of his murder was often visited. In addition, St. Paul's Cathedral was a centre of the faith and by the 1320s became an enormous construction, the biggest in Britain in Middle Ages (Museum of London, 2011). Furthermore, according to Ackroyd (2000), the Catholic Church played a crucial role in Medieval London, for the clergy owned lands and estates, and besides many clergymen were employers and provided job for people. In addition, London was a city full of churches, as their number exceed the volume of other cities in Medieval Europe. 

            Jews also lived in London and they settled after the Normans conquered the Britain. A gheto situated in Old Jewry was their place of residence. As they believed that wooden houses are dangerous, new stone houses were constructed by them (Lambert, n.d.). Moreover, they lent money, built better buildings, but because of jealousy of the residents they had to escape the country (Museum of London, 2011).  According to Lambert (n.d.), in 1189 persecution encompassed the city and about 30 Jews were killed. The number rose about 70 years later, and at the end of the 13th century the expulsion of Jewish people occurred.

            The years 1348 and 1349  became a nightmare not only for Londoners, but also for the whole Britain. As Ibeji (2011) shows, the plague evoked panic and scare on the British Isle. Someone said that the year 1349 was “wretched, terrible, destructive year, the remnants of the people alone remain.” Admittedly, the Black Death (see Figure 12) began in Bristol, but other parts of Britain were also affected; hence, it is not surprising that the Black Death came to London. As Ackroyd (2000) shows, it is estimated that about fifty thousand people died, which constitutes about 40% of the whole population. Eleven years later this communicable illness returned not having mercy. However, the origins of the plague did not stem from the city, but it was because of the civic conditions that it spread so easily. What communicated the illness were the rats that lived in thatched Medieval buildings. Moreover, as Ibeji (2011) points out, because of  overpopulation and  pollution of the Thames and sanitation which was pretty bad, the bacterium of the Black Death had an easy way and rampaged. This infectious illness was recurring every almost ten years until the fifteenth century, and eradicating it was impossible at that time.

 

 

Figure 12. Black Death. Marcello. Source: http://andrewgough.co.uk/articles_memento/

 

             In addition, in the Middle Ages it was guilds that were in the centre of interest and life of people. The guilds had the control over the trade and all craftsmen were of significant position in the society (Medieval London Guilds, 2015). As Ackroyd (2000)  maintains, because of their high social rank, craft guilds are presumed to have chosen the Council in 1351 and 1377. The guilds had their own code and highlighted the importance of a good name, righteousness and hard-work. As it can be seen from the names of the guilds, people dabbled in different crafts such as production of brass weapon, candles, leather, arrow, documents or clothing. Worth mentioning is the fact that the names of the London's streets were given after the industry that had been mostly practised at that place; for instance, we have Bread Street or Pudding Lane (Medieval London Guilds, 2015). 

 

planta
life in middle ages
tudor london

1.5. Tudor London (XV c)

 

Now it is time to explore London during the reign of the Tudors. London kept growing and more and more people were born and flooded in. Along with this dynasty, new changes, innovations and reformations occurred. Renaissance brought a new way of thinking and innovative beliefs. New problems and conflicts began to arise; however; London was still visible in the background of events that took place in the fifteenth and sixteenth century. Hence, let us introduce you the world of the Tudors house, both controversial and colourful. 

 

 

1.5.1. About the Tudor dynasty

 

As Hanson (2015) maintains, the Tudor house was in power from the year 1485 and up to 1603. What are they famous for is that they were able to make England a “world power.” It is all owing to being peace makers during the wars between France and Spain. What is more, their house was stable and the Tudor monarchs ruled for 118 years. According to Lipscomb (2015), it is this dynasty that shaped Britain and its identity. Because of Reformation a king become the Supreme Head of the Church and nationalism was ascribed to all institutions of religious faith. Next, the structures of officialdom and administration of modern Britain have their roots in these times. Besides, the secret service came into being. Worth mentioning is the transformation of Parliament, which began to play a crucial role. 

            Moreover, the reign of Tudors, particularly of Elizabeth I is called the Golden Age in Britain. To begin with, as Lipscomb (2015) maintains, thanks to different voyages and expeditions to various continents and lands, England became a wealthy and well-prosperous country. Thus, famous travellers and explorers such as Sir Cabot, Sir Hawkins or Sir Drake travelled and discovered new goods and nations. What is more, with discoveries the development of the navy was noticed. Next, as Ford (2013b) shows, the entertainment flourished and especially theatre came in. In the time of this queen’s rule, many theatres were built and the most renowned appeared in London such as the famous Globe, the Hope, the Swan or the Rose. And here a renowned playwright appeared: it was William Shakespeare. In his works one can notice the discrepancy between the rural and civic life. There existed a divide between the country and the land, between the Catholic faith and Protestantism and the feeling of being  between the devil and the deep blue sea was manifested in his plays (Shakespeare’s London, 2003). In addition, apart from Shakespeare many talented painters, writers and playwrights were widely known, be it, for instance Sir Thomas Wyatt, a poet, or Hans Holbein, a painter of the monarchs.

         Moreover, the Tudor kings are known to be  great builders and their skills can be noticed in the buildings in London. In particular, as Ford (2013b) states, Henry VII (Figure 14), the first king of the Tudor house ordered to expand Westmister Abbey and a chapel bearing his name was built on, as you can see in Figure 13. 

         

 

Figure 13. Henry VII’s Lady Chapel. Source: https://tammydotts.wordpress.com/2010/04/12/european-adventure-day-1-big-be/

 

 

And this renowned chapel is  considered to be a great achievement of Renaissance. Moreover, other buildings such as the Palace of Sheen and Baynard's Castle were also rebuilt. 

 

 

 

Figure 14. Henry VII.  Source: http://englishhistory.net/tudor/monarchs/henry-vii/

 

 

In addition, the next monarch called Henry VIII (see Figure 15) was also interested in architecture and during his reign York House became expanded and called  the Palace of Whitehall.  Moreover, the glory and splendour of previous religious structures were seen when Henry VIII began to rule. 

Figure 15. Henry VIII. Source: http://www.hrp.org.uk/learninganddiscovery/Discoverthehisto

ricroyalpalaces/monarchs/henryVIII

 

However, the Suppression of Monasteries led to the destruction and adaptation of all sacred buildings to use for laymen. Even during Elizabeth I's reign, these all damages were easily noticed. As Ackroyd (2000) maintains, not only did the English Reformation initiated by this king influence religious beliefs but also it altered all buildings. The churches, monasteries and abbeys were being pulled down and the whole city was rebuilt. London was in ruins, the author seems to state, as it more resembled the construction site than a place where people live.  

 

 

 

 

1.5.2. Life in Tudor London: buildings, the city, population, theatres

 

How did London look like during the Tudor reign? Thomas Dekkar gives  a great description of the city in a pamphlet entitled The Seven Deadly Sins of London:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And thus, as Alchin (2005) shows, London was a place full of energy, noise and people who were occupied. It was thriving and new buildings were being built such as workshops, theatres or houses. People had a lot of entertainments, for instance, the fighting of the cocks. The buildings destined to the entertainment were omnipresent such as inns or taverns. Next, there was a full range of different people who dabbled in both commendable and blameworthy actions, and hence we had merchants, apprentices, actors but also beggars, thieves and other criminals. Nevertheless, the situation of the poor was not easy; still, despite many inconveniences, the life of residents improved and the rich could afford many goods that were perceived luxurious: pillows, beddings or wooden pallets. The poor ate using tin plates and middle-income residents could even buy drapery, brass, linen or dressers (Ackroyd, 2000).

            Population of London rose rapidly between the 15th, 16th and 17th century. Starting with about 60, 000 residents,  it soon turned to 250, 000 (Lambert, n.d.). As it is shown in "Shakespeare’s London" (2003), the growth of London was strictly connected with the Thames, for the river provided food, particularly oysters, which were thought to be the basic meal of the poor. Besides, the river had other roles and was a means of transport, water and gutter. What is more, London was not well-lit and did not have any patrol. That is why, some rich district were not safe; for instance, Blackfiars was a place that  could pose a threat for those walking at night. Other places in which the margin of the society lived were the root of criminal actions (Shakespeare’s London, 2003).

            As Ackroyd (2000) shows, overpopulation posed a problem; however, the development of the city was unavoidable. Queen Elizabeth I was worried that many people flooded in, and because of their poverty they had to beg and there was not enough spacious rooms and houses. And that is why, Elizabeth I proclaimed to ban “any new buildings of any house or tenement within three miles from any of the gates of the said city of London” (Ackroyd, 2000, p.89). This proclamation also included the demand that in one house only one family was to live. Nevertheless, after 3 years, many new buildings were constructed outside the city and her idea misfired, as nobody was able to control the growth of London.

            Despite the fact that London lost its sovereignty and the mayor was to be appointed by the king, the city became the capital of the country. Many immigrants came and the city became cosmopolitan. Fashion rose in popularity, as many weavers, dyers immigrated and textile shops sprang up. London's position was unique, as many foreigners described it as a place full of wealth and  as a colourful place. On the other hand, many claimed that Londoners were hot-tempered and xenophobic (Ackroyd, 2000). The apogee of xenophobia could be seen in 1601, when the residents started to be prejudiced against them. Black people tended to come because of being freed from galleys belonging to Spain. And in the same year, these new immigrants were not accepted and attempts to banish them took place.  There were a lot of people of different nationality that came to London. Black immigrants started to appear on the streets of London (Shakespeare’s London, 2003).

Carts and coaches make such a thundering din as if the world ran on wheels; at every corner men, women, and children meet in such shoals that posts are set up to strengthen the houses lest with jostling with one another they should shoulder them down. Besides, hammers are beating in one place, tubs hooping in another [the noise made by coopers or barrel makes], pots clinking in a third, water-tankards running at tilt in a fourth... Tradesmen, as if they were dancing galliards are lusty at legs and never stand still (Thomas Dekkar, The Seven Deadly Sins of London, 1606)

1.5.1.
1.5.2

 

 

 

1.1. Introduction

 

One of the revue songs is entitled "Why Can’t We Have the Sea in London?" The only thing that London lacks, it seems, is the access to the water. However, in a sense, once there was a sea in Greater London; it was fifty million years ago that London was covered with great water. The evidence of sea life can be found in various building, be it Customs House, whose building material reflects the currents' direction in the past or the research made on clay that shows the process through which the London's soil went. In addition, one can notice the remains of sharks, oysters or crocodiles. Thus, it is assumed that a watery area prevailed to this day (Ackroyd, 2000). And hence, London was a sea and still remains one, as the city of London is like an ocean, as expansive as the drink, said Dostoyevsky, can be (Yogerst, 1997). Moreover, as Ackroyd (2000) states, indeed, London is a metaphorical sea that contains ten thousands houses, where people meander along the streets like rivers; this city is like a raging water,  restless and unpredictable; the streets' sound is like a whisper coming from sea shells. Moreover, the capital of Great Britain, for Percy Shelley, a British Romantic poet, in His letter to Maria Gisborne is a "great sea" that "still howls on for more."

            And thus, if there is water, life begins. A city upon this rich area came into being. It had its ups and downs; there were times when prosperity flourished, yet clouds on the horizon  could also be spotted. Now, it is time to get to know the history of London made by various civilizations, not based on speculations. Therefore, let us return to the old days of war, conquer and splendour. In this essay a history of London will be presented; the contribution of nations such as the Romansthe Anglo-Saxonsthe Vikingsthe Normansthe Tudors and the Stuarts will be described as well as the main events in the eighteenth-nineteenth- and twentieth- century will be shown.

1.3. The Saxons in London

 

After the Romans, a new nation appeared on the British Isle; they were called the Anglo-Saxons and came at the beginning of the fifth century. It was thought that these new people contributed to the destruction of London; still, according to many researches, there were not any slaughter or arson (See the illustration of Roman London in Figure 2).  The Chronicles describe London as an important centre; still, memorials may not be genuine and totally true. For instance, let us mention the myth of famous King Arthur, who fought against Anglo-Saxons and he along with his knights sat around his Round Table. This whole story may also be a fiction although it was in the Anglo-Saxons Chronicle (Ackroyd, 2000).

Figure 2. Lundenwic, London trading city. Source: http://www.inlondonguide.co.uk/london-history/medieval-london.html

 

In addition, as Ford (2013a) maintains, this new nation, it seems, acknowledged the significance of the city, for London was controlled by East Saxon overlords. However, it was the arrival of Christianity that enhanced the fame and importance of the current capital of Great Britain, as London became an episcopate of the whole Britain under the pope's decision. And in 604 St. Paul's Cathedral was founded and paganism started to decline.

          Nevertheless, the peace was disrupted by the Danish raids. Despite the fact that London played a crucial role in trade for the Anglo-Saxons; nevertheless, it was destroyed by the Danes that began to come in the ninth century (Cody, 2010). However, as Lambert (2014) shows, it was Alfred the Great that defeated them completely. As Ackroyd (2000) maintains, Alfred considered London to be a place worth conquering and it was here where he proclaimed to be a ruler of the whole region. And since this moment, even in the further history, London remains a symbol of power. As Cody (2010) states, during the reign of Alfred, the city began to prosper once again, although fires occurred, as houses and all buildings were made of wood. According to Ackroyd (2000), the reconstruction of the city took place thanks to great urban skills of this Saxon king. Besides, the reign was later given to Ethelred, a son-in-law and during his governance, in this period, feudal system is believed to have been born.

          “London Bridge is falling downone can hear nowadays a famous nursery rhyme (Lambert, 2014). As Holdsworth (2013) shows, between 991 and 1013 the Danes attacked the British Isle. Ethelred was forced to leave London, and the Danish king conquered the city. However, after the death of the ruler of the Danes, Ethelred attempted to reclaim his city, yet there was one obstacle that had to be crossed - it was  London Bridge. The king of Norway Olaf Haraldsson, as shown in Figure 3, was asked for help.

 

Figure 3. A mural of St Olaf. Source: http://londonist.com/2013/02/how-the-king-of-norway-pulled-down-london-bridge.php

 

On the bridge, the Danish soldiers were supposed to attack any enemy that they spotted with spears. King Olaf came up how to destroy the bridge. According to Ackroyd (2000), London Bridge was destroyed by tying vessels with the use of hawsers and ropes.

Figure 4. Reconstruction of Medieval London Bridge. Adapted from http://www.inlondonguide.co.uk/london-history/london-bridge-old-new.html

 

As Lambert (2014) states, it is doubtful whether this event of destroying London Bridge took place or not (look at Figure 4 to see the reconstruction of London Bridge). It could have been a legend that was made up in order to dignify Olaf, like the poem below written by  Ottar Svarte, a poet:

 

London Bridge is broken down,

Gold is won and bright renown.

Shields resounding

War Horns Sounding,

Hildur shouting in the din!

Arrows singing,

Mailcoats ringing

–Odin makes our Olaf win!

 

Stuart London

 

1.6. Stuart London

 

As Barrett (1997) maintains, after the death of Elizabeth I, a new successor to the throne was called James I, who was also the king of Scotland. This king is believed to have started the house of the Stuarts. Although thanks to his succession, the union between Scotland and England  came into being, it did not last long. A lot can be said about the Stuarts reign, be it their controversial beliefs both involving politics and religion or their lifestyle or attitude towards many different facts. And thus the most important events and facts will be described below.

 

 

1.6.1. Political background: the Stuarts and the Civil War

 

During  the Stuarts reign, there were many conflicts between the Catholics and the Protestants, who also called themselves the Puritans and aimed at purifying the Church more thoroughly. According to Barrett (1997), the Gunpowder Plot that took place in 1605 is one of the most famous Catholic conspiracy during these times. See the excerpt of the newspaper in Figure 16. Guy Fawkes is assumed to have tried to destroy the House of Parliament and to have attempted to kill the king by blowing him up. 

 

Figure 16. The Gunpowder Plot  in the News. Source: http://talesofcuriosity.com/v/GunPowder/

 

 

As Ross (n.d.) maintains, after discovering the plot, it is thought that Guy Fawkes, as depicted in Figure 17, was found with explosive materials in the cellars of the building of Parliament. After this attempt, Guy was executed along with his fellow criminals and because of this event harsh laws were imposed on the Catholics. Even now, every year on November 5, the commemoration of this happening is celebrated, during which a doll resembling Fawkes is burned (Barrett, 1997).

 

Figure 17. Guy Fawkes discovered in the cellar. Source: http://talesofcuriosity.com/v/GunPowder/

 

 

Next, the Puritans were also not liked by James and he did not listen to all their complaints and demands. The Bible was translated, but James did not want to bear the presence of people in favour of Puritanism anymore. And hence, several groups left the country; for instance, to Holland and even to America boarding the ship called Mayflower so as to start a new life far away from the British rule (Barrett, 1997).

            What is more, as Barrett (1997) shows, what describes the Stuart reign is their endless conflict with Parliament. James, who was convinced that his power had its origins in God, did not want Parliament to assembly. However, the whole institution was unwilling to disappear but was more eager to gain more political power. Then, we have Charles I, as portrayed in Figure 18, who was quiet, thoroughgoing, crafty and unreliable, as shows Court (2013). Moreover, the author also asserts that Charles was a great believer in being a representative of God on the Earth and was convinced that all his words should have been treated as law. 

 

Figure 18. Anthony van Dyck’s Charles I Dismounted. Source: https://www.studyblue.com/notes/note/n/chapter-20-northern-europe-1600-1700/deck/2774761

 

 

And this contributed to more disputes with Parliament and the relation between them was becoming worse and worse (Barrett, 1997). Next, he unwillingly accepted the Petition of Rights that “forbade arbitrary arrest and imprisonment and deemed that taxes should be raised only by an act of Parliament.” Nevertheless, the dissolution of Parliament took place one year later and the king ordered the absolute reign over the country. Still, his plans encountered difficulties in the form of Scottish rebellion, particularly caused by religious issues. For he did not have enough money and people, the situation made him ask Parliament for help, and the assembly occurred. The conflict continued and later was used by Irish Catholics who rebelled. It was believed that Charles I supported the Irish side and this fact along with his willingness to arrest several members of Parliament caused the Civil War.

            As Court (2012) states, the Civil War began in 1642 and was fought between the proponents of Charles I, the Royalists and the divine right of the king to the throne and the Parliamentarians that were willing to deprive the monarchs of this title and to limit the rulers’ power and force them to act only with their assent. Oliver Cromwell and General Henry Ireton, the leaders of the Parliamentarians, were winning and wanted to enter into negotiations with Charles I; however, he was unwilling to collaborate. The former side was supported by London, the South and Scotland, while Charles was backed by Wales, North and West. Ironically, as Ross (n.d.) states, even London did not take the side of the king, but helped Parliament. The king lost his head in London in Whitehall. Next, as Barrett (1997) maintains, Cromwell and members of Parliament who were in favour of beheading the king created the Protectorate in 1653 and there was a dissolution of Parliament. Cromwell ruled until the day he died, which was in the year 1658, and along with him republicanism weakened and two years later Charles II was chosen to be king. Ross (n.d.) claims that it was Restoration that brought back the monarchy and caused the destruction of the capital. However, this return of monarchy was not peaceful, as riots took place. As far as London is concerned because of heavy destruction of the city during the Civil War, London was under extensive construction and new trends in architecture began to appear. The city was rebuilt, new squares and buildings appeared.

 

 

1.6.2. The Great Plague and the Great  Fire of London

 

Still, as Johnson (2013) explains, the times of the Stuarts reign encountered two serious problems such as the Great Plague and the Great Fire of London. To begin with, it was in the year 1665 that the epidemic broke out. Nevertheless, it was not a new thing, as epidemic was always impending over the British people since the Middle Ages. It is perceived to have been the last one of  the recurring sentence of the epidemic. It all started in the outskirts of  St. Giles and was spread by rats, as it was previously in the Medieval era.  The high point of the Great Plague was noticed in September 1665 when almost 8,000 people died per week. In London houses, in which dead bodies were left, remained and the only sound that could be heard was mourning. The upper classes left the city in order to live in the country. Moreover, many innocent animals were deprived of their lives so as to stop the deadly plague (The Great Plague of London, 2015). Samuel Pepys in his Diary shows his regret that many people died and shows the seriousness of the epidemic:

 

But Lord, how empty the streets are, and melancholy, so many poor sick people in the streets, full of sores, and so many sad stories overheard as I walk, everybody talking of this dead, and that man sick, and so many in this place, and so many in that. And they tell me that in Westminster there is never a physitian, and but one apothecary left, all being dead - but that there are great hopes of a great decrease this week. God send it (The Diary of Samuel Pepys, 16 Oct 1665). 

Despite the fact that the epidemic ceased in 1666,  another disaster took place and it was the Great Fire of London, as illustrated in Figure 19. According to Johnson (2013), the fire was started by accident, as one of the bakeries in Pudding Lane in the vicinity of London Bridge combusted.  It was in September 1666 when the fire began to spread and because of flammable material that was wood from which the buildings were made, all city soon went up in flames. Moreover, the water wheel was in shreds and the city was deprived of water. Samuel Pepys once again recorded the events:

“By and by Jane comes and tells me that she hears that above 300 houses have been nurned down tonight by the fire we saw, and that it was now burning down all Fishstreet by London Bridge. So I made myself ready presently, and walked to the Tower and there got up upon one of the high places. Sir J. Robinsons little son going up with me; and there I did see the houses at that end of the bridge all on fire, and an infinite great fire on this and the other side the end of the bridge - which, among other people, did trouble me for poor little Michell and our Sarah on the Bridge. So down, with my heart full of trouble, to the Lieutenant of the Tower, who tells me that it begun this morning in the King's bakers house in Pudding Lane, and that it hath burned down St Magnes Church and most of Fishstreet already. So I down to the waterside and there got a boat and through bridge, and there saw a lamentable fire. Poor Michells house, as far as the Old Swan, already burned that way and the fire running further, that in very little time it got as far as the Stillyard while I was there. ” (Samuel Pepys, The Diary of Samuel Pepys, 1666 September 2)

As Ross (n.d.) affirms, the fire was strengthened by wind and spread easily to the centre of London. Four days lasted the flames and the blowing stopped.

Figure 19. A seventeenth-century painting showing the Great Fire of London by an anonymous artist. Anonymous painter. Source: http://www.traveldarkly.com/sites-great-fire-london/

 

 

Despite the fact that not more than 10 people died, above ten thousand buildings were destroyed. However, the damage was not impossible to repair and Christopher Wren showed his plan of rebuilding London. However, his aspirations were not accepted, for the costs were too higher and many people built houses in the same way as before. Similarly, Johnson (2013) maintains that the realization of Wren’s Rebuilding Act from the year 1667 did not take place, for the government lacked money. Still, it was assumed that houses ought to be made of stone and brick. For this reason, many buildings were solid and the streets became widened and paved. Still, the plan may not have worked for the poor; however, the churches were rebuilt according to his plan and many modern religious buildings in London are the work of Wren (Ross, n.d.).

 

 

1.6.3. Life in London in the 17th century

 

As Lambert (2014) shows, there was a steady growth in the English population in the 17th century (see Figure 20 below). By 1700s the number of people accounted for about five million. Moreover,  much wealth was accumulated by residents. The 17th century brought the development of trade and other industries such as glass, iron or mining. In the society a hierarchy became visible, and hence, at the top of the social ladder was aristocracy, then we had gentry, who like the nobles, were rich, but did  not possess as much wealth as the highest class. Next, there were farmers called yeomen who owned land, but worked along with their employees. The rest of the society dabbled in craft, others were farmers of simply workers. Besides, it was aristocracy and wealthy people that were powerful and influential; however, the merchants became a key figure in order to fulfil the needs of aristocracy. As Emsley, Hitchcock, and Shoemaker (2015a) state, many people were employed also as servants, construction workers, chairmen or washerwomen.

            Admittedly, the life of the people from the upper class was easy and convenient; nevertheless, the poor’ lives were not all roses. It is estimated that the needy were unable to eat meat regularly. However, as a prevention, almshouses were built where the rich could give all their assets to those people that needed help. They had to write in their wills that they want to dedicate the money to these places (Lambert, n.d.) What is more, the difference between aristocracy and the poor could be seen in the way of building. According to Lambert (n.d.), in the 17th century splendid houses could be spotted, however, built by the wealthy part of the society. Here, a division of the city into west where rich residents lived and the east end whose residents were poor was seen. As Emsley, Hitchcock, and Shoemaker (2015a) the “City of London within the Walls” was perceived as a heart of business, richness, and surliness. Moreover, Joseph Addison described London as a place consisting of various folks (as cited in Spectator, 1712). However this emerging diversity in economy in culture did not prevent both classes from encountering each other. Hence, it was not seldom to see areas where beautiful mansions were next to the poor and dilapidated house. In addition, as Lambert (n.d.) presents, apart from fine rich buildings, the city itself was not clean or sanitary. There was a tendency to throw water and litter in the narrow streets until a piped supply of water along with canalization was introduced. However, it was still too expensive for many and they could not afford it.

 

Figure 20. 17th Century London in 3D. Source: http://www.freetech4teachers.com/2013/11/17th-century-london-in-3d.html#.VWDpSU_tlO4

 

            Despite the Great Plague, cities went on growing and enlarged their area, as it was with London. As Ackroyd (2000) shows, after the Great Fire, London was under construction on a grand scale. It is believed that the rebuilding was not fast, but steady and slow. Buildings became solid and better, tenement flats narrower, as it was stated in the above-mentioned Wren’s Rebuilding Act. The reason for widening the roads was a new innovation. Originally, people went on foot or by boat, but  the 17th century brought a new trend of hiring a horse carriage called a hackney carriage. Besides, at the beginning of this period, oil lamps started to emerge (Lambert, n.d.). 

 

 

1.7. Georgian London

 

The Georgian reign started in 1714 and ended in 1830 and it stems from the monarchs whose names began with the letter G. During this period, Parliament gained power and assembled regularly, for Hanoverian kings were not interested in politics (The Georgian Period - Background, 2015). Still, in spite of this non-interference, Britain and its capital flourished and London became an influential and wealthy city, which allowed the development of art, industry and many other novelties.

 

 

1. 7. 1. The importance of Georgian London

 

London remained a “leading and commercial centre” and thanks to colonies became rich and powerful (Barrett, 1997, p. 57). As Ackroyd (2002) shows, in the eighteenth century London became a centre of world trade. In this period everything could be sold or bought. More than three-fourth of world trade was going through London. Credits and  promissory notes were popular and money was lodged by goldsmiths. The Bank of England, which is the symbol of pride and wealth of Britain, was born. Brokers were of great significance, as they were now responsible for stock issues of different enterprises. In addition, Barrett (1997) states that the development of trade enabled the birth of new jobs for artisans or craftspeople (see Figure 21 and 22 to admire Georgian art). Moreover, London was believed to be the heart of court life and politics. Here the monarchs lived and spent their time; for instance; George III’s residence was Buckingham House. In addition, Britain became a world power, thanks to the treaty after the Seven Years’ War with France in 1763. Besides, people demanded luxurious goods such as tobacco, silk or furs, and that is why Britain took part in many wars against the Dutch or Canada, from which it emerged the victor and gained new lands in Africa, the Caribbean and America. The blow which was the loss of American colonies was compensated by discovering Australia and New Zealand, which were treated as a replacement and the convicts were sent there.

 

Figure. 21. Doing the Georgian walk. Source: http://www.thelondonmagazine.co.uk/people-places/london-life/doing-the-georgian-walk.html 

 

 

 

1. 7. 2. Life in Georgian London: society and new innovations

 

As Emsley, Hitchcock and Shoemaker (2015b) maintain, the coronation of George I was accepted with ambivalent feelings by Londoners. Owing to different perception of religion and politics and because of George’s actions against Catholicism, there was anxiety among people. Dread of crime, the growth of criminal activity, uncertainty involving the economic situation and uneasiness led to this mixed feelings. Londoners were afraid of disappointment but at the same time waited for an opportunity.

            According to Barrett (1997), the 18th century London is best described as a place full of contrasts. In spite of two disasters from 1665 and 1666 respectively, its population grew. It was because of the surge of people from the country that wanted to find a job in the city, for new improvements in farming  contributed to their loss of job. As Lambert (n.d.) shows, the year 1700 brought an increase in the population and their number rose from 600,000 to 950,000 in 1800. What is more, the Suburban area enlarged its size and expanded to the north, east and south. However, as Emsley, Hitchcock, and Shoemaker (2015b) maintain, this growth was stable until 1740s and ten years later a baby boom could be noticed.  There were brief crises and depressions; for instance, bad weather in late 1740s led to poverty. Other reasons for the high mortality of people were poor sanitary system, harsh condition of housing and the uncontrolled passing of the newly-born children. Owing to it, the Foundling Hospital was founded  and the stances towards offsprings changed for the better. Next, the idyllic plans of Christopher Wren unfortunately misfired and instead of being the land of milk and honey, London was full of destroyed and unsanitary ruins. The slums appeared and people lived in poverty (Barrett, 1997).

            Let us focus more on the society in Georgian London. As Johnstone (2014) presents, obviously, the structure of society, divided into social classes, was preserved. And hence, we had the upper class that was only a minority. Because their wealth was substantial, they were often victims of various crimes, as police were nowhere to be found in Georgian London. However, there were many ways of spending money, be it for example travelling. Particularly, young people who had finished their studies went on a trip to Italy in order to learn more about classical Greek culture, for at that time, Classicism was very popular (The Georgian Period - Background, 2015). 

Figure 22. Barthélemy Du Pan’s The Children of Frederick, from 1746. Source:  (Royal Collection trust. Queen Elizabeth II) http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/exhibitions/the-first-georgians-art-and-monarchy-17141760-the-queens-gallery--exhibition-review-9250284.html

 

Next, there was middle class that consisted of people dabbling in various occupations such as business, commerce, finance, shopping, and whose lifestyle was an imitation of the nobles. Many people were starting as tradesmen or amateurs and later they were called professionals. Still, this social group was not big and in London lived only 20% of them (The Georgian Period - Background, 2015). Thanks to them, a new type of house came into being: it was a terraced house. Finally, at the bottom of social ladder we had the lower class, who was a dominant group. According to Johnstone (2014), this stratum was exploited by the upper class. The life of the people from the lower class was completely different from the life of aristocracy, as they worked long, were not completely free and the mortality among them was high, for they lacked medicine and nutritious food. In addition, children began to work at the age of five as chimney sweepers which was one of the most terrible job. This occupation contributed to the cancer because of the fact that during doing it, inhaling dust from the chimneys was unavoidable. However, in comparison with the previous generations, people’s lives were still better, as there was a job for everyone, for instance, in factories and mills (The Georgian Period - Background, 2015).

            As Ross (n.d.) presents, there were many innovations, new ways of entertainment and trends that were visible in Georgian London. Firstly, newspapers gained ground and Spectator was the most respected and popular in London. Secondly, there was a revival of the Palladian architecture. As Manco (2013) maintains, Hanoverian kings adopted Classicism, so as to show their respect towards Greek and Roman heritage. The buildings from this period were symmetrical and delicate. Thirdly, coffee houses became a new form of socialization. According to Ross (n.d.), they were called a social revolution whose course was rather peaceful. This new form of entertainment  allowed people to meet and have political talks and it was in the coffee houses  that the London Stock Exchange is believed to have been born. Next, as White (n.d.) states, the theatre was still popular since Elizabethan times, and hence night plays, musicals, ballets and  acrobats’ performances were regularly visited by people. Moreover, in this period celebrities started to be born; for instance, David Garrick, who was an actor, had many fans and was surrounded by them when he travelled. However, the spectators differed from the contemporary audience, as it was common to be noisy, to talk during spectacles, to eat, drink and even throw food at actors. Besides, another form of entertainments were pleasure gardens, which were places full of plants where people walked and drank tea. Next, we had fairs, which were not simply markets but included various forms of amusement, be it tightrope walking, boxing, puppet shows or displays of unusual animals. Many stalls with different type of food were omnipresent such as nuts, puddings, pies, sausages and alcohol. The biggest fair was called Bartholomew Fair, which took place on September annually. Finally, people wanted to see things, creatures that were uncommon and that is way the displays of wild animals, giants, little people, foreigners or the sick were spotted easily. In addition, bloodshed was liked as well; for example, we had bull and cock fighting.

 

1.6.1
1.6.2.
1.6.3.
Georgian London
1.7.1.
1.7.2.
Victorian London

 

1. 8. Victorian London

 

 

As Bennets (2011) shows, London did not cease to flourish and it was impossible to stop its flow. London was a city of constant change, and Tudors, Restoration and Hanoverian kings influenced greatly this place. As a result of both negligence and advance, being a mixture of all decades and eras it wrestled with eternal problems that involved safety, poverty, and sanitation. Still, the Victorian times were a period of peace and well-being, for industry developed, novelties appeared and culture flourished. Let us focus more on the era of Queen Victoria and get to know her London, but firstly see Figure 23 that illustrates Victorian London.

 

 

Figure 23. Paul Castrey’s Victorian London Street Scene. Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/

paintings/victorian-london-street-scene-43714

 

 

1.8.1. The significance of London, politics and industrialisation

 

According to Evans (2011), Elizabethan navy may have been powerful; however, it was during the reign of Queen Victoria that “Britain really ruled the waves.” In the XIX century Britain consolidated its might and was still called a world power. In this age peace was considered to be an indispensable element of the well-being. Britain was responsible for omnipresent world order and only one war broke out when Victoria was the queen: it was the Crimean War of 1854 that lasted two years. During Queen Victoria’s reign, at the end of the XIX century Britain became an empire, which land accounted for one-fifth of the world and it was presumed that allegedly one-fourth of all people living on the Earth pledged allegiance to this monarch. Still, the conquests of new lands were bloody, despite the fact that many colonizers were faithful to the idea of doing good. 

            As Evans (2011) maintains, the new queen was chosen when industrial revolution started to emerge. Thanks to industrialization, new industries were born, consumerism grew in popularity and people became better off; moreover, it contributed to the growth of towns. Mack (2005) states that Britain lost its agricultural character on the behalf of industrialisation. New technological developments could be seen, especially, factories were founded. It is assumed that industrialisation was a result of the progress of commerce and mercantilism. Next, the most significant changes that took place were the discovery of iron smelting, and the improvement of the steam engine, roads and railroads. According to Brown (2004), the construction of the Underground had its roots in 1865. Still, industrialisation cut both ways and as side effects, poor people had dilapidated houses, worked long hours and felt ill easily. Admittedly, Victorian Britain was an emblem of advance and preponderance; but, on the other hand, depravity was widespread (Evans, 2011).

 

 

 

1.8.2. Life in Victorian London: society, problems and culture

 

According to Emsley, Hitchcock, and Shoemaker (2015c), London grew by leaps and bounds and this growth involved the city itself and its population. As Brown (2004) claims, the population of London in the XIX century increased from about 2 million to 19,8 million between 1801-1891. London attracted everyone, be it the oppressed, the needy or immigrants from the other side of the world who came here like they were under hypnosis. Thus, many Welsh, Scots and Irish people went to live in London; however, apart from them  many Asians appeared in the city, be it, for instance Chinese. Besides, black people also came to London, as Emsley, Hitchcock, and Shoemaker (2015c) show. Brown (2004) presents more detailed account of English population: after the year 1800 until 1810 the population increased by 23% and in 1840 to 1850 it grew by 21%. It can be said that London’s rise in people was the fastest in Europe, although between 1830s and 1840s a lot of people died because of contaminated water, dampness and tuberculosis, for health care was inefficient and its development was steady and slow (Evans, 2011).

            According to Emsley, Hitchcock, and Shoemaker (2015c), society was divided and social hierarchy remained to this day. For the rich, the poor were a different nation, despite the fact that low classes were within easy reach of  the nobles. It was culture and refinement that differentiated them from the poor. The person who depicted the world of the needy to the aristocracy was Charles Dickens. In Figure 24 you can see a digital illustration od Dicken's London depicted in his books.

Figure 24. Dicken's Victorian London Goes Digital. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/movies

/01kehr.html

 

 

In Oliver Twist, the ignorant nobles were able to get to know the life of children in poor quarters of the town.  To begin with, as Cody (2002) states, at the top remained the aristocracy, whose wealth stemmed from successful trade, industry and even professionals also climbed to this class. This stratum was in control over politics and did not allow the lower classes to vote. Next, industrialization led to further division into classes. Hence, we had the middle class, the working class. There was a wide difference between these two strata; for instance, different occupations belonged to different class, people were divided into skilled and those who had no skills at all. At the bottom we had “sunken people” who were poor and had hard lives. Thanks to the rising influence of socialism, Trade Unions started to be established in the 1850s and fully fledged workers were able to create Trade Unions that improved their situations while the poor were still victims of exploitation.

            There were many problems in modern London. Apart from its richness and splendour of the buildings, it struggled with poverty, noise, fog, contamination and poor condition of living (Bennetts, 2011). Firstly, as Brown (2004) claims, because of immigration there were not enough houses and the conditions of living were poor. As Diniejko (2013) maintains, slums originated as a result of the surge of immigrants and workers who looked for cheap houses. Slums were unsanitary and overcrowded, and yet the rich disobliged this problem, for they thought that these dilapidated buildings were created because of the sloth and sin of the poor. And hence bad sanitation was omnipresent; and contamination was a great problem (Bennetts, 2011). In addition, according to Brown (2004), communicative diseases were also widespread, such as typhoid or cholera that appeared in 1831. And hence, mortality rate was high in spite of a nonstop surge of immigrants. Next, according to Bennetts (2011), fog posed a problem, and it was not an invention of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. It was generated as a side effect of burning coal used to heat the houses. Its omnipresence was even encountered in summer, and it was like “an acrid, dull grey blanket hanging perpetually over the city” (Bennetts, 2011). Moreover, the author also states that the clamour created by carriages (as shown in Figure 25), factories, docks was unbearable: “a universal hubbub; a sort of uniform grinding and shaking, like that experienced in a great mill with fifty pairs of stones, ” said a person visiting the West End (Bennetts, 2011). What is more, children were forced to work from the early ages in order to provide for their families; besides, the conditions of working were terrible, as the working hours reached even 16 hours per day (Cody, 2008). 

 

Figure 25. Dickens’ Victorian London by Alex Werner and Tony William. Source:  http://www.ghostsigns.co.uk/2012/03/signs-and-more-in-dickens-london.html

 

 

            In the Victorian period people had many ways of entertainment. Firstly, as Temperley (2007) shows, theatre prospered and that is why, operettas of Gilbert and comedies of Wilde came into being; nevertheless, Shakespearean plays were not forgotten. Besides, novels were also performed on the stage and changed into drama. In theatres one could encounter melodramas, pantomime and songs. Secondly, as Bashford (2007) presents, music was of great significance. Mostly performed life, it was an indispensable element of everybody’s life. Not only did people want to be entertained, but they also created new songs and pieces. Thirdly, people spent their free time doing sports. As Arnstein (2007) presents, the most popular were fishing, hunting and horse racing. Moreover, rugby, cricket and football started to emerge and gain grounds. Besides, the residents could visit circuses, zoos and pleasure gardens or see street artisans. Magicians were popular too, for the ghosts, puzzles, levitation and other attractions were uncommon and fascinating (Victorians. Popular culture, n.d.).

 

 

1.8.1.
1.8.2.
1.9.

1.9. London in the XX century 

 

Now, it is time to go to modern times and review the most important events that took place during this period. As Barrett (1997) shows, the Victorian Age was a period of great prosperity, and Britain was a world power; however, everything has to end some day, as was it with the magnitude of this country. Let us firstly have a glance on London at the beginning of the century.

            And hence, as Barrett (1997) states, in the XX century London remained a lively and busy city. The continuation of London as the most significant place in the world could be found still in the beginning of the XX century. Besides, liners, electric lightening and carriages without horses were not a rare sight. However, for many people the London from these times was pretty the same as the London from the age of the Victorians. In addition, the stratification of people did not disappear but became more visible. In spite of being the city that was flourishing, poor people did not live in luxury. Next, during this period, music-halls were very popular and it was in these great songs that a life of common people was presented.

 

 

Figure 26. War damage: London came under attack from the air during World War One as giant German Zeppelin air ships dropped bombs on the city's streets. Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1061691/Revealed-Pistol-sparked-World-War-One-goes-display-Britain-time.html

 

 

After the outbreak of the First World War (see Figure 26 and 27), the music halls were to recruit young men to go to war. The song were about being brave and fighting for a countries and eulogized the bravery. Still, as the war did not seem to end, they were hated, for they later contained only empty words and had a plaintive character. It may be the case that this hatred came from the disappointment and feeling betrayed, as the songs became an empty tool used by those in power (Jones, 2013).

 

 

Figure 27. Picture display: This building in London's East End was completely destroyed in a German attack. Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1061691/Revealed-Pistol-sparked-World-War-One-goes-display-Britain-time.html

 

 

What was the political situation in Britain like? According to Barrett (1997), Britain emerged the victor from the Boer War; still, its global respect was damaged. Other countries such as the USA, France and Germany rose in power and became strong rivals. The might of Germany evoked dread and an alliance between France and Britain was formed. And now, the peaceful times of Queen Victoria were destroyed and the First World War broke up in 1914 during the reign of Edward VII. This war devoured many innocent lives of young people and the promises of getting new lands were unfulfilled and poor living conditions and unemployment were to be found after the war. Next, as Jones (2013) maintains, during this war, the citizens experienced the direct attack, as Zeppelins bombed the city. Still, London being surrounded by waters was not an easy target and finding the city posed a problem. The war brought new changes, as after the war, public transport was developed and the stratification started to decline, for many men were killed.

            Besides, as Barrett (1997) maintains, the XX century was also the era of Jazz. Those who were rich and lived in the times of the Roaring Twenties enjoyed themselves by listening to a new type of music. New trends, such as cocktail dresses, silent films that came from oversees, and new types of writing popularized by Virginia Woolf and D. H. Lawrence were to be found. Still, after the Wall Street Crash, Britain was engulfed by Great DepressionGeorge V, called Edward VII died and his son was the king only for a short while, as Edward VIII being in love with Wallis Simpson married her and had to give up the throne. His brother George VI was chosen the king and along with his wife Elizabeth became the most popular royal couple, for they had helped the needy during attacks of Germany.

            Barrett (1997) shows that  the Second World War began in 1939 and London was completely changed, as a result of bombing many buildings were destroyed. The lives of people were harsh, as they were only a few safe places, and moreover they were separated from their families. The war also contributed to the demise of the empire that Britain used to be. What made matters worse, all colonies, one by one became independent, though some of them still exist in the Commonwealth. As Jones (2013) points out, the Second World War altered London. The year 1941 was the period of bombing and the blitz occurred and because of that even at night the bombs were dropped. Residents were forced to get accustomed to staying at public shelters, or in stations located under the ground.

        According to Barrett (1997), in spite of the end of war, there was still anxiety, for Britain engaged in war against North Korea in 1950 and  fought with Egypt in 1956. Moreover, this period was an era of Cold War and it led to Britain’s invention of hydrogen bomb. Nevertheless, there was the other side of the coin, as in  1947 a festival of music and drama occurred in Edinburgh,  which was later followed by the Festival of Britain in London. In the second half of the XX century, economical situation and living conditions improved. More and more people were buying various goods, such as TV or cars. Schools sprang up, education became more important and moreover, the entertainment industry grew in popularity and music, films emerged. The Swinging Sixties were the times of permissiveness, freedom, optimism and entertainment. However, by the end of the 1960s pessimism started to return, as the prices of oil along with the standard of living rose and high inflation was beginning to appear. Next, both Wales and Scotland started to feel their distinctiveness and national feelings were omnipresent. In the 1980s Margaret Thatcher was chosen to be the prime minister and during her governance Britain flourished and the Docklands in London were perceived as the emblem of this period. Later in the 1990s there was a return of Recession and the previous prosperity began to fall. Still, problems remained: European Union was not without distrust, Royalty was in the centre of attention, there was an increase in national feelings in Wales and Scotland, economy was weak, industry diminished. However, these problems are not unusual and for the UK, who is like a raging sea that flows in perpetuity, it was a sign that the country was still doing well. 

 

 

1. 10. Conclusion

 

All’s well that ends well says the proverb and now it is time to finish our journey to London starting from the prehistory and ending with modern times. London is nowadays the capital of one of the most influential countries in Europe and even in the world. The modern Britain as well as London was shaped through time by different nations, people, events and history. London underwent various alterations but it remained one of the most popular destinations of all people. And thus the following dynasties and periods have been explained and described, such as: the Roman dynasty, the Norman house, the Middle Ages, the Tudors’ times, the Stuarts, Georgian times, Victorian times and the 20th century. 

                 The waters of ocean tend to expand and cannot be stopped and one can say that London is like a water that streams and never stops, for it flows constantly without taking a break. Through centuries its "watery area" spread and new houses, buildings, roads and other innovations began to emerge, which all occured thanks to the flux of various nations and culture that they had brought alongside. Besides, London is like ocean, as high and low tides correspond to its ups and downs. Moreover, going around this city is like sailing through great water. Avoiding obstacles and meandering through different streets is inevitable. Next, in the ocean, sea life thrives and in London people are born and live. The sea can be unpredictable and nobody never knows what can happen, so is London; you cannot predict what and who you will meet. The sea can drown you, pull you down and overwhelm you, so can London. Seas, oceans and rivers are unknown, traitorous and may have a skeleton in the cupboard, so may London. Nevertheless, as aforementioned Percy Shelley said, the capital of UK "still howls on for more," and hence, its turbulent waters are  not going to stop, but will raise even higher and higher, for ocean is alive and unstoppable.

1.10. Conlcusion
1.11. referencje

 

1. 11. References

 

Ackroyd, P. (2000). London. The biography. New York: Anchor Book.

Alchin, L. (2015). Globe Theatre London. Retrieved on May 11, 2015, from 

Arnstein, W. L. (2007). Victorian sport. Retrieved on May 18, 2015 from 

 

Barrett, P. (1997). History. In R. Williams (Ed.) Insight Guides. Great Britain. UK: APA

Publications.

Bashford, Ch. (2007). Music and the Victorians. Retrieved on May 18, 2015 from  

Bennets, M. M. (2011). London in the early 19th century. [BLOG POST]. Retrieved on     

Brown, R. W. (2004). The City in European History. London in the nineteenth century. 

Retrieved on May 17, 2015 from  http://www2.uncp.edu/home/rwb/london_19c.html

City history. (2014, May 1). Retrieved on April 13, 2015, from http://www.cityoflondon.    

Cody, D. (2002). Social class. In Victorian Web. Retrieved on May 18, 2015 from     

Cody, D. (2008). Child labor. In Victorian Web. Retrieved on May 18, 2015 from 

Cody, D. (2010). A brief history of London. In Victorian Web. Retrieved on April 13, 2015, from 

Court, S. (2012). Killing the king: The trial and execution of Charles I. Retrieved on   May 15,

Court, S. (2013). Politics, Protestantism and personality: The causes of the English Civil War.

De Lisle, L.,  & Jones. D. (2005). Tudors or Plantagenets: Which royal dynasty put the great 

Diniejko, A. (2013). Slums and slumming in late-Victorian London. Retrieved on May 

Evans, E. (2011). Overview: Victorian Britain, 1837 - 1907. In BBC. Retrieved on May

Emsley, C., Hitchcock, T., & Shoemaker R. (2015a). London in 1674-1715.  

 

Emsley, C., Hitchcock, T., & Shoemaker, R. (2015b). London in 1715-1760.  Retrieved on 

Emsley, C., Hitchcock, T., & Shoemaker, R. (2015c). London, 1800-1913. Retrieved  on  

Ford, D. N. (2013a). Saxon London. In Britannia. Retrieved on April 11, 2015 from 

Ford, D. N. (2013b). Tudor London. In Britannia. Retrieved on April 11, 2015 from

Hanson, M. (2015). Tudor England FAQ & facts: Frequently asked questions & 

information. Retrieved on May 11, 2015 from http://englishhistory.net/tudor/tudor-england-faq/#One

Holdsworth, R. (2013). How the king of Norway pulled down London Bridge. Retrieved on

Hoskins, B. (2010). Stephen and Matilda: Where history happened. In History Extra

Retrieved on May 1, 2015 from http://www.historyextra.com/feature/stephen- and-matilda-where-history-happened

Ibeji, M. (2011). Black Death. In BBC. Retrieved on May 3, 2015, from

Johnson, J. [Jane]. 2013. 19th century London. In Britannia. Retrieved on May 17,2015 from

Johnson, M. (2013a). Norman London. In Britannia. Retrieved on April 11, 2015 from 

Johnson, M. (2013b). Stuart London. In Britannia. Retrieved on May 3, 2015 from   

Johnson, B. (2015). The Norman Conquest. In Historic UK. Retrieved on April 25, 2015,

Johnstone, J. (2014). An introduction to... The Georgian  era. History is now magazine. [Blog

Jones, L. (2013). “Modern times in London.” In Britannia. Retrieved on May 22, 2015 from   

Lambert, T. (2013). A history of Roman England. In Local histories.Retrieved on April 2, 2015, from 

Lambert, T. (2014a). Daily life in England in the 1600s. In Local histories. Retrieved on from  

Lambert, T. (2014b). Daily life in the 18th century. In Local histories. Retrieved on May 17, 

Lambert, T. (n.d.). A brief history of London, England. In Local histories. Retrieved on 

Lipscomb, S. (2015). What’s so gripping about the Tudors? Retrieved on May 11, 2015

Mack, P. M. (2005). The British Industrial Revolution. Retrieved on May 17, 2015 from

Manco, J. (2013). Georgian architecture. Retrieved on May 16, 2015 from

Medieval London guilds. (2015). In Lord and ladies. Retrieved on May 3, 2015 from 

Museum of London. (2011). Pocket histories. Exploring history thorugh objects. What

was life like in medieval London? Retrieved on May 1, 2015 from             http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/files/2813/7034/6325/WhatwaslifelikeinMe dievalLondon.pdf

Olson, D. (2008).  London for dummies. London: Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Richard the Lionheart. (2014). In The Middle Ages. Retrieved on May 1, 2015, from             

Roberts, A. (2013). The mighty-and overlooked-reign of the Plantagenets. Retrieved on May 2

2015, from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/06/the- mighty-and-overlooked-reign-of-the-plantagenets.html

 

Ross (n.d.), London history.  In Britain Express. Retrieved on April 11, 2015,  from

Shakespeare’s London. (2003). Retrieved on May 11, 2015, from 

Shipton, V. (2006). London. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

Spaltro J., & Bridge, N. (2015). Royals of England: A guide for readers, travelers, and

genealogists. USA: IUniverse, Inc.

Pepys, S. (2003). The Diary of Samuel Pepys. M.A.F.R.S. In Gutenberg. Retrieved on May 1, 2015,

The Georgian Period - Background. (2015). Retrieved on May 5, 2015, from

The Great Plague of London. (2015). In Harvard University Library Open Collections   

Program. Contagion. Historical Views of diseases and epidemics. Retrieved on May 15, 2015, from http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/contagion/plague.html

Temperley, N. (2007). Victorian. Retrieved on May 18, 2015 from  

Victorians. Popular culture. (n.d.). Retrieved on May 18, 2015 from 

White, M. (n.d.). Geogian entertainement: From pleasure gardens to blood sports. Retrieved on

Yogerst, J. (1997). London. In R. Williams (Ed.), Insight guides. Great Britain (pp. 125-133). 

London: Apa Publications.

bottom of page